Liberal Forum

I see you were looking in the mirror while typing this. Well done. You finally admit it. 

Ok stalker. Now read all of this. I know how you are when reading...well anything. You can only handle 4 words. 

1. First, with respect to your use of the word "mortality":                  I bet you still think dead people are involved. Hence, why you chose that word. 

2. Too vague. You made it vague on purpose because you don't know. It's what narcissists do. No surprise. 

3. Your definition could mean serval different things:

• Selection bias which is not the same as survivorship bias. It means the participants selected for a study do not represent the broader population accurately.  Which is something that you would probably do because you are a moron. This leads to skewed results. Your definition encapsulates that also. 
• Attrition bias which is not survivorship bias either.  It refers to longitudinal studies, and no ****, I am not going to define "longitudinal studies." This means if participants drop out, gone missing, or just say to hell with it and don't follow up at the same rate, the remaining sample may not accurately represent the original population. Your definition also encapsulates this. 
  
  Actually, there are several more types of biases that your definition reflects, but I have gone over the word count that you are capable of reading. 

 I bet you still think

Too vague

Your definition could mean